Address:
Number of words:
421
Summary:
We want to reduce crime companies? Stop the exorbitant fines on large companies! There is a better way.
Keywords:
Body material:
Corporate crime? I'm not sure that there is such a thing. If we want to reduce the crimes that are given that lable, and we need to finish impose punitive fines for large companies. The idea is not radical as it sounds.
First of all, when I say that there is no such thing corporate crime, simply means that there are always individuals who commit crimes. With that in mind, you can imagine what is the best way for me to reduce this crime is: Go after the criminals!
Who pays the price of this crime companies? </ B>
Exactly who pays when a large company fined for violating the law? To begin with, and pay equity. Many of these are retirees of innocent people who have money invested with the company and had no idea they were violating the law. Then pay the workers with the loss of jobs, in the case of damage to the financial situation of the company through fines. Who does not pay? Only the criminals - individuals who have chosen to break the law.
And all crimes committed by people, not companies. When a company dumps toxins in the environment, has made a decision of the people to do this (or several people). Individuals make when a company steals from the retirement fund, or violate the rights of workers, those decisions. People commit crimes, companies, not companies.
If you want to stop crime, companies, and start placing individuals who are involved in this crime in prison. Our current system in many cases, company officers, which makes the cost / benefit calculations as to whether the profits from certain crimes are greater than what the fines when add up to. Although the laws are broken, and that it stands little chance of being held personally liable. Why do not we hold them responsible?
Fine for companies to cover the actual costs imposed on others from crime is appropriate. We have to clean up toxic messes, and in other cases, compensate those who suffer from damage. This also means that the shareholders have no reason to be cautious in the selection of those in the Board of Directors. However, the "punitive" fines silly unless it is enforced against individual criminals. Make the person who committed the crime pay the fine.
This is such a radical idea? I do not think so! By the way, and that you think is more likely to deter companies from officer to commit a crime, and a fine paid by the company, and so does not affect his salary, or ten years in prison? The answer to this gives us the answer to the crime of companies.
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Checks and Balances
Background Check Resources
Whether you are a contract with the Executive Director, under 1, babysitter, or even looking for a new tenant or roommate, you are a big risk. This is unfortunately the nature of people to go to work very hard to imagine and thus create the need for resources to a background check and references.
Avoid dealing with deceptive people with these five basic factors in mind:
1. Preparing a complete history of vague answers or misleading
2. Filter fact from fiction and a lot of interviews dishonest
3. Address legal issues, including questions as you can and can not ask
4. Trusting, thoughtful decision to appoint
5. Use the compromises that protect you legally during the background check process
Personal references
It may be a personal reference to any person for the candidate who happens to know, but probably will not work for. For owners or people who are looking for a nanny for their children should apply for an auditor who is always to obtain business references and not the character. The relationship between landlords and tenants there is still work it is like the relationship between nannies at home and working in the field of health care and employers. These days, personal references and became one of the slogans which exaggerates hides the real work of the administrator, and check the signal.
Background Checks
Background check on the last term is an inclusive term that means to verify the accuracy of basic information supplied by the candidate for work or something like that. This is an important step in the selection process of the employee because it is a painless and relatively inexpensive to a prospective employer to limit the application stack for the candidates who are, at least, who say they are.
While determining whether the candidate is one who says he or she claims it is an important first step, it should eventually lead to the verification of a true reference. It is even more to learn about the candidate for work or a prospective tenant or even a babysitter to 1 before making a final decision. The only way to find out by talking to people who worked with him, leased to, or receive a service or care of the candidate declared.
Important issues of application
There are several things you can do for employers to increase the likelihood of receiving answers to the functionality of honest questions:
1. Always ask the job seeker to provide a resume that contains the date of the entire work, including hours of work for each job.
2. The candidate was asked to provide the name of the person him / her directly.
3. Employers should always require candidates to work on the mobilization of a formal job application requesting the same information. One way or another, even if you have to ask at the first interview, you will have a job description that the job seeker, an official in each post.
If the list does not include references to at least one candidate for people who, directly or should be a red flag warning in mind for a prospective employer. Some job seekers said they do not give the former supervisor as a reference because both of them did not agree and this is understandable, but over the history of the individual in the all work, there must be at least one supervisor who may be a reference. While the candidate was never ever any admin, then you better look for another candidate for the position.
No, every job does not result in a happy ending, but with the above precautions in mind, it can reduce the possibility of burning or hire someone more suitable to the task. The presence of more information about the job seeker is always better than having less. By working with others to get to most of our objectives, the right choice for them, it is necessary.
Whether you are a contract with the Executive Director, under 1, babysitter, or even looking for a new tenant or roommate, you are a big risk. This is unfortunately the nature of people to go to work very hard to imagine and thus create the need for resources to a background check and references.
Avoid dealing with deceptive people with these five basic factors in mind:
1. Preparing a complete history of vague answers or misleading
2. Filter fact from fiction and a lot of interviews dishonest
3. Address legal issues, including questions as you can and can not ask
4. Trusting, thoughtful decision to appoint
5. Use the compromises that protect you legally during the background check process
Personal references
It may be a personal reference to any person for the candidate who happens to know, but probably will not work for. For owners or people who are looking for a nanny for their children should apply for an auditor who is always to obtain business references and not the character. The relationship between landlords and tenants there is still work it is like the relationship between nannies at home and working in the field of health care and employers. These days, personal references and became one of the slogans which exaggerates hides the real work of the administrator, and check the signal.
Background Checks
Background check on the last term is an inclusive term that means to verify the accuracy of basic information supplied by the candidate for work or something like that. This is an important step in the selection process of the employee because it is a painless and relatively inexpensive to a prospective employer to limit the application stack for the candidates who are, at least, who say they are.
While determining whether the candidate is one who says he or she claims it is an important first step, it should eventually lead to the verification of a true reference. It is even more to learn about the candidate for work or a prospective tenant or even a babysitter to 1 before making a final decision. The only way to find out by talking to people who worked with him, leased to, or receive a service or care of the candidate declared.
Important issues of application
There are several things you can do for employers to increase the likelihood of receiving answers to the functionality of honest questions:
1. Always ask the job seeker to provide a resume that contains the date of the entire work, including hours of work for each job.
2. The candidate was asked to provide the name of the person him / her directly.
3. Employers should always require candidates to work on the mobilization of a formal job application requesting the same information. One way or another, even if you have to ask at the first interview, you will have a job description that the job seeker, an official in each post.
If the list does not include references to at least one candidate for people who, directly or should be a red flag warning in mind for a prospective employer. Some job seekers said they do not give the former supervisor as a reference because both of them did not agree and this is understandable, but over the history of the individual in the all work, there must be at least one supervisor who may be a reference. While the candidate was never ever any admin, then you better look for another candidate for the position.
No, every job does not result in a happy ending, but with the above precautions in mind, it can reduce the possibility of burning or hire someone more suitable to the task. The presence of more information about the job seeker is always better than having less. By working with others to get to most of our objectives, the right choice for them, it is necessary.
Employers are less likely to employ Muslims?
Research at the University of Davenport by Murad Ali indicates that Muslims are less susceptible to all other ethnic groups to be appointed by the employers. Participants were students enrolled in MBA or undergraduate courses either. The type of work full-time students taking part in, ranging from entry level to senior management. Most MBA students are already hiring managers and was on the power within their companies.
Participants ranked their candidates for the positions required in terms of their own preconceived ideas of 1-5. And the order of 1 means that the demand was more desirable, and a rating of 5 means that the applicant is desirable. Was sentenced on all qualified candidates on an equal footing and they were all men. The only difference between the candidates by name. And used Robert Schwalbach (white), Tyrone Johnson (black), Yan Chen (Asia), and Pedro Gonzalez (Latin), and Ahmed Al-Arabi (Muslim) to represent different races and ethnicities.
Results of the study indicated that the following order of preference as follows African-American, Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic and Muslim. The African Americans are more likely to be recalled to work while the Muslims were the least. Data were divided into two groups with similar African Americans, Caucasians and Asians in the far left with Latinos and Muslims in the far right. The data came that refer to the history of the participants were not collected.
It is interesting to note that people who are considered "mainstream" or was in the country for some time was very similar in their order. Hispanic and Muslims who consider that the new immigrants class and less likely to employ. In essence this means that immigrants are not considered to have the same opportunity for employers that "the American mainstream." It is therefore possible that poverty, unemployment and lack of health care may be something imposed on this group by personal choice.
And that employers should be aware of the results of this study because it has an impact on their compliance with the law on civil rights. Muslims can become more aware of their rights in the workplace, employers have more trials for the treatment. If hiring managers allow their personal preferences to determine who will be involved, rather than the most qualified, may be affected and a summary of the company.
Participants ranked their candidates for the positions required in terms of their own preconceived ideas of 1-5. And the order of 1 means that the demand was more desirable, and a rating of 5 means that the applicant is desirable. Was sentenced on all qualified candidates on an equal footing and they were all men. The only difference between the candidates by name. And used Robert Schwalbach (white), Tyrone Johnson (black), Yan Chen (Asia), and Pedro Gonzalez (Latin), and Ahmed Al-Arabi (Muslim) to represent different races and ethnicities.
Results of the study indicated that the following order of preference as follows African-American, Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic and Muslim. The African Americans are more likely to be recalled to work while the Muslims were the least. Data were divided into two groups with similar African Americans, Caucasians and Asians in the far left with Latinos and Muslims in the far right. The data came that refer to the history of the participants were not collected.
It is interesting to note that people who are considered "mainstream" or was in the country for some time was very similar in their order. Hispanic and Muslims who consider that the new immigrants class and less likely to employ. In essence this means that immigrants are not considered to have the same opportunity for employers that "the American mainstream." It is therefore possible that poverty, unemployment and lack of health care may be something imposed on this group by personal choice.
And that employers should be aware of the results of this study because it has an impact on their compliance with the law on civil rights. Muslims can become more aware of their rights in the workplace, employers have more trials for the treatment. If hiring managers allow their personal preferences to determine who will be involved, rather than the most qualified, may be affected and a summary of the company.
Health care approach to physician assisted suicide
There is a growing interest in suicide. When people start looking for more information about suicide, you will be able to meet their needs. This article is a brief description of a lot of information about it. Let's start with three levels of discrimination in the act of euthanasia.
There are three levels of distinction in the act of euthanasia:
1. The first is the patient who was in a coma or brain death. In such cases, ask the doctor to "pull the plug", or remove the patient from mechanical life support. Generally, these cases were not contested by the general public. This is an act of withdrawal or denial of the use of mechanisms to maintain a life that can not be sustained. It is here that the intention of recognizing the individual and the character of the body is all that remains.
2. Another act of euthanasia involves the use of morphine for patients hospitalized in the final stages of a painful or life with diseases like cancer and AIDS.
3. The latter category of patients euthanasia is relatively healthy, and at the beginning of a terminal illness who wish to end their lives. Conditions such as Alzheimer's and cancer patients who want to prevent the information on the system performance evaluation. This is the most controversial of the three issues that have participated in euthanasia.
Euthanasia of Greek origin meaning "good death". This is to end the life of another person is able to do this by increasing the demand of the person he wants to die. Here are some terms you need to know in the performance appraisal system that determine the actions that take place.
Passive euthanasia is the hastening of death by altering some form of support and letting nature take its course. This could include removing the life support equipment, and stop medical treatment or procedures, and stop the consumption of food and water, leading to dehydration or starvation, and withholding CPR (CPR). The most common use for performance evaluation is to give patients high doses of morphine to relieve pain. It is likely that relief of pain and suppression of breathing and cause death earlier this would have happened otherwise. This is also done on patients who are in a coma patients or persistive are not able to regain consciousness following brain injury.
Active euthanasia is the deliberate use of the means of causing the death of one person by direct action. Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a Michigan physician, is well known in 1998 with one of the patients who have the disease (Lou Gehrig's disease). The patient who is afraid of suffering long involved in the disease and wanted to die the death quick and painless. Dr. Kevorkian injected controlled substances in this patient and caused death. Were accused of murdering a degree Kevorkian, but the jury found him guilty of murdering grade 2 March 1999.
Physician-assisted suicide is to provide information or a means to a dying patient with the intention of committing suicide.
The involuntary euthanasia is to end the patient's life without a clear demand it.
"There are several reasons why you want to enjoy the PAS patients. Is this just part of depression, which, the disease has led to the transformation of one or the mental and emotional illness leads to suffering means to exit the body. Others live in chronic pain due to the lack of coverage of health care. or a way to get the drug of the group later, die earlier and not to incur medical expenses for those who are serious disorders or diseases, such as:. will ASL and Huntington's disease, multiple sclerosis, AIDS and Alzheimer's disease, and these are some of the people prefer to avoid diseases, loss of independence and financial range. in some respects, which gives people a sense of control over the process of their lives. "
There are three levels of distinction in the act of euthanasia:
1. The first is the patient who was in a coma or brain death. In such cases, ask the doctor to "pull the plug", or remove the patient from mechanical life support. Generally, these cases were not contested by the general public. This is an act of withdrawal or denial of the use of mechanisms to maintain a life that can not be sustained. It is here that the intention of recognizing the individual and the character of the body is all that remains.
2. Another act of euthanasia involves the use of morphine for patients hospitalized in the final stages of a painful or life with diseases like cancer and AIDS.
3. The latter category of patients euthanasia is relatively healthy, and at the beginning of a terminal illness who wish to end their lives. Conditions such as Alzheimer's and cancer patients who want to prevent the information on the system performance evaluation. This is the most controversial of the three issues that have participated in euthanasia.
Euthanasia of Greek origin meaning "good death". This is to end the life of another person is able to do this by increasing the demand of the person he wants to die. Here are some terms you need to know in the performance appraisal system that determine the actions that take place.
Passive euthanasia is the hastening of death by altering some form of support and letting nature take its course. This could include removing the life support equipment, and stop medical treatment or procedures, and stop the consumption of food and water, leading to dehydration or starvation, and withholding CPR (CPR). The most common use for performance evaluation is to give patients high doses of morphine to relieve pain. It is likely that relief of pain and suppression of breathing and cause death earlier this would have happened otherwise. This is also done on patients who are in a coma patients or persistive are not able to regain consciousness following brain injury.
Active euthanasia is the deliberate use of the means of causing the death of one person by direct action. Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a Michigan physician, is well known in 1998 with one of the patients who have the disease (Lou Gehrig's disease). The patient who is afraid of suffering long involved in the disease and wanted to die the death quick and painless. Dr. Kevorkian injected controlled substances in this patient and caused death. Were accused of murdering a degree Kevorkian, but the jury found him guilty of murdering grade 2 March 1999.
Physician-assisted suicide is to provide information or a means to a dying patient with the intention of committing suicide.
The involuntary euthanasia is to end the patient's life without a clear demand it.
"There are several reasons why you want to enjoy the PAS patients. Is this just part of depression, which, the disease has led to the transformation of one or the mental and emotional illness leads to suffering means to exit the body. Others live in chronic pain due to the lack of coverage of health care. or a way to get the drug of the group later, die earlier and not to incur medical expenses for those who are serious disorders or diseases, such as:. will ASL and Huntington's disease, multiple sclerosis, AIDS and Alzheimer's disease, and these are some of the people prefer to avoid diseases, loss of independence and financial range. in some respects, which gives people a sense of control over the process of their lives. "
Chaos as an organizing principle
The recent wave of accounting fraud scandals signals the end of an era. Been the disappointment and resentment of American capitalism that leads so far tectonic ideological shift from laissez-faire, and self-regulation to state intervention and regulation. This will reverse the trend dating back to Thatcher in Britain and Reagan in the United States. It would also partly fundamental - and way more ancient - the principles of free marketry in serious doubt.
Is seen to markets and self-regulation, and exchanges, self-assembling of information, goods and services. Adam Smith's "invisible hand" is the sum of all the mechanisms of interaction that leads to optimal allocation of economic resources. Great advantages of the market over central planning and specifically the lack of random and self-awareness.
Market participants go about their own selfishness, in an attempt to maximize their utility, oblivious of the interests and work for all, and in order to prevent people from direct interaction with them. One way or another, over the chaos and noise, the structure comes out of the system, and efficiency are unmatched. Man is capable of producing better results deliberately. And therefore, is any intervention, and intervention to be harmful to the functioning of the economy.
This is a simple step from this ideal view back to the doctrine of natural, who preceded Adam Smith, who put forward the principle of "passage, and allow" - a battle cry out of the hands. The natural religion. Market, as a gathering of individuals, they thunder, and the title was certainly on the enjoyment of rights and freedoms to all and all. John Stuart Mill, balancing state intervention in the economy in time and his influence is great, "Principles of Political Economy," published in 1848.
Was not affected by the evidence of market failures - for example to provide public goods at reasonable prices and plentiful - and this theory wrong back in the last two decades of the century. And became privatization, liberalization and self-regulation buzzwords and ephemeral part of a global consensus propagated by both commercial banks and multilateral lending institutions.
It also applies to the professions - accountants, stockbrokers, lawyers, bankers, insurance companies, and so on - self-organization was founded on the belief in long-term self-preservation. It is assumed that rational economic actors and moral agents to maximize their usefulness in the long term by observing the rules and regulations of equal opportunities.
It seems this noble tendency, unfortunately, have been manipulated by greed and selfishness and love of self and an inability to delay gratification is mature. Self-regulation fails spectacularly to conquer the very human nature that its removal led to the most intrusive tricks developed than ever before. In both cases in the United Kingdom and the United States, and the government is much more widely and heavily involved in entering into the details of the traffic, and accounting of securities, and the World Bank than it was two years ago.
But morality and the myth of "order out of chaos" - went further than that - with his supporters in the exact sciences as well. Was imbued with a culture very deeply from trade and converted. It is not surprising that the Internet - a chaotic network with an anarchic modus operandi - flourished at these times.
It was the dot-com revolution less about technology and new ways of doing business - and I do not know how to be reconciled with a combination of ingredients, and stir well, and hope for a better future. Person, for example, offers a model of a linear income how to translate "eyeballs" - that is, the number of visitors to a Web site - to money ("financial benefits"). He considered this to be true dogmatically, miraculously, traffic - a chaotic phenomenon - will translate into profit - until now as a result of hard work.
The privatization itself such an act of faith. Were transferred wholesale to the hands to maximize their profits - state-owned assets, including facilities and providers of public services such as health and education. The implicit belief was that the price mechanism will allow the planning and organization are not. In other words, it was assumed that the high prices to ensure uninterrupted service. Followed by the failure may be expected, - from electricity utilities in the state of California to railway operators in Britain.
Simultaneous crumbling of these urban legends - the power of liberation from the Internet, in the self-regulating markets, Proceedings of the unleashing of privatization - inevitably gave rise to a backlash.
The state has grown to enormous sizes in the decades after World War II. He is about to grow and digest some of the sectors so far untouched. To say the least, it is not good news. But freedoms - brought on ourselves by thwarting the work of that invisible regulator - all supporters of individual freedom and individual responsibility in the market.
Is seen to markets and self-regulation, and exchanges, self-assembling of information, goods and services. Adam Smith's "invisible hand" is the sum of all the mechanisms of interaction that leads to optimal allocation of economic resources. Great advantages of the market over central planning and specifically the lack of random and self-awareness.
Market participants go about their own selfishness, in an attempt to maximize their utility, oblivious of the interests and work for all, and in order to prevent people from direct interaction with them. One way or another, over the chaos and noise, the structure comes out of the system, and efficiency are unmatched. Man is capable of producing better results deliberately. And therefore, is any intervention, and intervention to be harmful to the functioning of the economy.
This is a simple step from this ideal view back to the doctrine of natural, who preceded Adam Smith, who put forward the principle of "passage, and allow" - a battle cry out of the hands. The natural religion. Market, as a gathering of individuals, they thunder, and the title was certainly on the enjoyment of rights and freedoms to all and all. John Stuart Mill, balancing state intervention in the economy in time and his influence is great, "Principles of Political Economy," published in 1848.
Was not affected by the evidence of market failures - for example to provide public goods at reasonable prices and plentiful - and this theory wrong back in the last two decades of the century. And became privatization, liberalization and self-regulation buzzwords and ephemeral part of a global consensus propagated by both commercial banks and multilateral lending institutions.
It also applies to the professions - accountants, stockbrokers, lawyers, bankers, insurance companies, and so on - self-organization was founded on the belief in long-term self-preservation. It is assumed that rational economic actors and moral agents to maximize their usefulness in the long term by observing the rules and regulations of equal opportunities.
It seems this noble tendency, unfortunately, have been manipulated by greed and selfishness and love of self and an inability to delay gratification is mature. Self-regulation fails spectacularly to conquer the very human nature that its removal led to the most intrusive tricks developed than ever before. In both cases in the United Kingdom and the United States, and the government is much more widely and heavily involved in entering into the details of the traffic, and accounting of securities, and the World Bank than it was two years ago.
But morality and the myth of "order out of chaos" - went further than that - with his supporters in the exact sciences as well. Was imbued with a culture very deeply from trade and converted. It is not surprising that the Internet - a chaotic network with an anarchic modus operandi - flourished at these times.
It was the dot-com revolution less about technology and new ways of doing business - and I do not know how to be reconciled with a combination of ingredients, and stir well, and hope for a better future. Person, for example, offers a model of a linear income how to translate "eyeballs" - that is, the number of visitors to a Web site - to money ("financial benefits"). He considered this to be true dogmatically, miraculously, traffic - a chaotic phenomenon - will translate into profit - until now as a result of hard work.
The privatization itself such an act of faith. Were transferred wholesale to the hands to maximize their profits - state-owned assets, including facilities and providers of public services such as health and education. The implicit belief was that the price mechanism will allow the planning and organization are not. In other words, it was assumed that the high prices to ensure uninterrupted service. Followed by the failure may be expected, - from electricity utilities in the state of California to railway operators in Britain.
Simultaneous crumbling of these urban legends - the power of liberation from the Internet, in the self-regulating markets, Proceedings of the unleashing of privatization - inevitably gave rise to a backlash.
The state has grown to enormous sizes in the decades after World War II. He is about to grow and digest some of the sectors so far untouched. To say the least, it is not good news. But freedoms - brought on ourselves by thwarting the work of that invisible regulator - all supporters of individual freedom and individual responsibility in the market.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)